|
Post by MG on Nov 25, 2017 13:54:31 GMT 1
You don't really understand my point... I don't mind when a country with small(er) industry like Macedonia borrows from Canada. However, i am kinda salty when it's the other way around. So no. "Salty". The only thing you get with this is having people laughing at your posts because you do the same thing lmao.
It's not like I care about the opinion of people who always have something against me.
|
|
Aless
Retired Administrator
he/him
10,258
27,554
funk generation
|
Post by Aless on Nov 25, 2017 13:56:19 GMT 1
"Salty". The only thing you get with this is having people laughing at your posts because you do the same thing lmao. It's not like I care about the opinion of people who always have something against me. It's not like I care about the opinion of people who are always rude and don't know how to say things with good manners yet being hypocritical.
|
|
|
Post by MaRtIn on Nov 25, 2017 13:56:30 GMT 1
How am I supposed to understand this? There are songs that you liked and other songs that you disliked which qualified (in the top 5 or through the RoTW voting). But the fact I qualified as well would be SOOOOOOO scandalous that it would justify to re-think the whole voting system? ? I really need an explanation there... For me personally, I'm just trying to find a consistent method of implementing the RotW voting since I think it's a great twist, but the results should reflect on that. Seeing Belarus score the poorest and then the other RotW wildcards score more than twice as much even though all four qualified the same way concerned me a little. None of the RotW wildcards have placed on the upper half yet, which questioned my certainty of them deserving it... It's hard to explain, but overall, I think the RotW voting needs to be consistent, and after two editions of using it, some changes could be made. If you have more questions, we can take it to a private message.
|
|
|
Post by MG on Nov 25, 2017 13:57:15 GMT 1
It's not like I care about the opinion of people who always have something against me. It's not like I care about the opinion of people who are always rude and don't know how to say things with good manners yet being hypocritical. Yes because saying “overrated” to a song is rude obviously.
|
|
Aless
Retired Administrator
he/him
10,258
27,554
funk generation
|
Post by Aless on Nov 25, 2017 13:58:18 GMT 1
It's not like I care about the opinion of people who are always rude and don't know how to say things with good manners yet being hypocritical. Yes because saying “overrated” to a song is rude obviously. No, but always labeling the song as if it was the Dominican Republic is.
|
|
|
Post by MG on Nov 25, 2017 14:00:11 GMT 1
Yes because saying “overrated” to a song is rude obviously. No, but always labeling the song as if it was the Dominican Republic is. You cannot deny it isn’t tho. The discussion ends here for me.
|
|
Aless
Retired Administrator
he/him
10,258
27,554
funk generation
|
Post by Aless on Nov 25, 2017 14:01:26 GMT 1
No, but always labeling the song as if it was the Dominican Republic is. You cannot deny it isn’t tho. But the discussion ends here. She may be Dominican, but she is half Brazilian. If that's way too hard for you to understand I'm sorry.
|
|
|
Post by Julian on Nov 25, 2017 14:01:47 GMT 1
"Salty". The only thing you get with this is having people laughing at your posts because you do the same thing lmao.
people who always have something against me. I'm sorry, when italix accused others of "teaming up" against him while having drama with you, you laughed about it but now you literally say the same
|
|
|
Post by MaRtIn on Nov 25, 2017 14:02:06 GMT 1
We've had enough too much drama. Let's not make another one. Although to be fair, I instigated it. I'm so sorry about that. Let's agree to disagree, let haters continue to be haters, and let hypocrites continue to be hypocrites. How about that?
|
|
1,942
5,805
Our first caress
|
Post by Mordecai on Nov 25, 2017 14:27:51 GMT 1
From an outside perspective, can some of you not? Martin deserves a huge amount of respect for being able to accommodate you all in such a massive contest whilst managing to keep (most of) you happy and he does not deserve the drama that seems to ensue at the conclusion of every edition because of different opinions. If he wanted to, he could cull numbers and as a result get rid of a lot of the drama that goes on. Think of the host I've been shit on so many times for sending Katy in FC this edition, but I don't cause a huge fuss because people are entitled to their own opinions. Some of you just need to know when to keep them to yourself.
|
|