|
|
Post by 𝖋𝖑𝖔𝖗𝖎𝖆𝖓 on Apr 21, 2015 16:21:23 GMT 1
lol rly I remember everyone making jokes about the island of last year But they had a fantastic stage you know and I was really amazed by it. If a stage wouldn't be a major part of a show then why shall the host broadcasters spend so much money on it? It's important indeed and I guess the most money goes to the stage. you were amazed by it i was there live and honestly it wasn't as perfect as every said - it was good, but nothing more. most money goes into promotion and all the things we don't even get to see |
|
6,115
9,597
´i want it, i got it´
|
Post by Kerem on Apr 21, 2015 16:23:02 GMT 1
The stage of the Germany NS isn't lovely. I don't say that because of one stage the show is lovely. I just say that a fact for a good show is also a good stage. A show will be better with a good stage instead of a bad one. Why do you think that so many people after Eurovision say "the show the stage everything was amazing"? The stage also reflects to the show. My complaints aren't unfounded, many people, like 70% have the same complaints so they aren't unfounded. Maybe it is the same 70% that think Spain wins every year and that the arenas are too small? Just get over it and enjoy the show ffs Next year I'll enjoy it more with my home country competing. |
|
Rick
Retired Administrator
12,513
25,981
Did it frighten you, how we kissed when we danced on the light up floor?
|
Post by Rick on Apr 21, 2015 16:23:09 GMT 1
Actually, the stage looks (and is) pretty original to be really honest. It is relatively small too - compared to other ESC stages - and numbers are speaking here. In fact it's even smaller than the Malmö Arena stage  But it doesn't mean the show won't be great like wtf. Small is WAY different from "bad". Like there's a huge difference. You brought up the NS stages argument, I don't think the Eesti Laul stage is the biggest tbh, but performances look amazing. Same goes for Melodifestivalen, Swedes rarely have LED screens on their stages and opt for lights. Why is it the most loved NS in Europe? There must be a reason, Kerem  It just shows the stage isn't the most important thing. You said the 2012 stage looked amazing. The only thing that looked somehow there were the performers who looked like ants on stage lmao it was a really cold stage in my opinion. A smaller stage helps viewers to focus on the performers and on the singers. And don't judge before you've seen a "stage in action" video, really, we don't even know how the light bulbs and screens will work. Just wait to be proven wrong, even I was saying last year the B&W Hallerne was such a bad venue and it turned out to be one of the most amazing arenas in the whole ESC history. |
|
6,115
9,597
´i want it, i got it´
|
Post by Kerem on Apr 21, 2015 16:25:00 GMT 1
I spoke with the creative production and they said that the stage isn't finished yet and lights are still to come. Even they said that they can understand the dissapointments. But some still can't  |
|
Daniel
Retired Administrator
He/any
18,846
55,119
Dell powers
|
Post by Daniel on Apr 21, 2015 16:26:18 GMT 1
Maybe it is the same 70% that think Spain wins every year and that the arenas are too small? Just get over it and enjoy the show ffs Next year I'll enjoy it more with my home country competing. Good luck and come on, it's just a stage <_< |
|
Rick
Retired Administrator
12,513
25,981
Did it frighten you, how we kissed when we danced on the light up floor?
|
Post by Rick on Apr 21, 2015 16:27:27 GMT 1
I spoke with the creative production and they said that the stage isn't finished yet and lights are still to come. A reason more to avoid complaining |
|
|
|
Post by Anesović on Apr 21, 2015 16:27:55 GMT 1
Complaining about the stage is alright, but Eurovision is more than how the stage is.
I still remember people complaining about last years stage, and now a lot of people are saying that 2014 is one of the best ESC years.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jan on Apr 21, 2015 16:28:27 GMT 1
The lower the expectations, the less complaints and disappointments
|
|
6,115
9,597
´i want it, i got it´
|
Post by Kerem on Apr 21, 2015 16:28:28 GMT 1
Actually, the stage looks (and is) pretty original to be really honest. It is relatively small too - compared to other ESC stages - and numbers are speaking here. In fact it's even smaller than the Malmö Arena stage But it doesn't mean the show won't be great like wtf. Small is WAY different from "bad". Like there's a huge difference. You brought up the NS stages argument, I don't think the Eesti Laul stage is the biggest tbh, but performances look amazing. Same goes for Melodifestivalen, Swedes rarely have LED screens on their stages and opt for lights. Why is it the most loved NS in Europe? There must be a reason, Kerem It just shows the stage isn't the most important thing. You said the 2012 stage looked amazing. The only thing that looked somehow there were the performers who looked like ants on stage lmao it was a really cold stage in my opinion. A smaller stage helps viewers to focus on the performers and on the singers. And don't judge before you've seen a "stage in action" video, really, we don't even know how the light bulbs and screens will work. Just wait to be proven wrong, even I was saying last year the B&W Hallerne was such a bad venue and it turned out to be one of the most amazing arenas in the whole ESC history. You're right the performers and the songs are still the major part of a show but I didn't said that the show will be bad I just said that a stage is important of a show too even if the main thing is music. |
|
Daniel
Retired Administrator
He/any
18,846
55,119
Dell powers
|
Post by Daniel on Apr 21, 2015 16:29:14 GMT 1
Actually, the stage looks (and is) pretty original to be really honest. It is relatively small too - compared to other ESC stages - and numbers are speaking here. In fact it's even smaller than the Malmö Arena stage But it doesn't mean the show won't be great like wtf. Small is WAY different from "bad". Like there's a huge difference. You brought up the NS stages argument, I don't think the Eesti Laul stage is the biggest tbh, but performances look amazing. Same goes for Melodifestivalen, Swedes rarely have LED screens on their stages and opt for lights. Why is it the most loved NS in Europe? There must be a reason, Kerem It just shows the stage isn't the most important thing. You said the 2012 stage looked amazing. The only thing that looked somehow there were the performers who looked like ants on stage lmao it was a really cold stage in my opinion. A smaller stage helps viewers to focus on the performers and on the singers. And don't judge before you've seen a "stage in action" video, really, we don't even know how the light bulbs and screens will work. Just wait to be proven wrong, even I was saying last year the B&W Hallerne was such a bad venue and it turned out to be one of the most amazing arenas in the whole ESC history. You're right the performers and the songs are still the major part of a show but I didn't said that the show will be bad I just said that a stage is important of a show too even if the main thing is music. This proves that you didn't get me lmao EDIT: o nvm deleted it |
|
It just shows the stage isn't the most important thing.
