2,590
7,570
Suggestions only by PM
|
Post by myskin on Aug 8, 2014 13:22:56 GMT 1
First song (Alexia - Dimmi Come, 2002): -"NBU" doesn't like the song because it's to famous for -"NBU" don't really like the fact that the song is so old... Second song (Emis Killa - Maracana): -DEFINITE NO ( NO REASON)! I'm Italian Alexia's song is famous in Italy, although it is old, has had success in the past years Emis Killa is very famous in Italy, I think he can not go to the competition for San Marino, this is very surreal I can suggest to you another song of Alexia (it is more recent 2013 and 2012)
|
|
Daniel
Retired Administrator
He/any
18,846
55,119
Dell powers
|
Post by Daniel on Aug 8, 2014 13:23:15 GMT 1
After the night without sleep, decided to say this in public. I'm strongly against the new "internal selection" rule. But, two of my songs were rejected yesterday without valid reasons and explanations why. Let me take it like this: First song (Alexia - Dimmi Come, 2002): -"NBU" doesn't like the song because it's to famous for (WTF?) -"NBU" don't really like the fact that the song is so old... They'd prefer a newer song. (Are NBU HoD of SMTV to choose a song, or me?) -They all like a song that NBU proposed me for Alexia. But I don't like it! -It's on a VEVO and it's a "disadvantage". -It seems like it was a hit in Italy, and they don't like a fact. Second song (Emis Killa - Maracana): -DEFINITE NO ( NO REASON)! Although none of the song breaks the rules of NVSC, they decided to reject it because they don't like it, song is too famous or no reason. I can say only that this rule is an unsucessfull try of controlling what each country sends and trying to manipulate with results, and this rejecting of my songs was a direct try of stopping me to make a good result. After an awful headache, I will say only one thing: will probably withdraw, and I call other countries to do that until this rule changes. will probably withdraw, but I DON'T WANT MY COUNTRY TO BE GIVEN TO ANYONE ELSE! 1. "NBU" doesn't like it -> Wtf? I don't see anything about that in the PM 2. "NBU" doesn't like the fact it is too old -> Actually only Jan said that and it is his opinion and you can't change that fact Well, she's like Alizée for Monaco, cause her last hit was like 15 years ago But I don't really like the fact that the song is so old... I'd prefer a newer song tbh Like for example this: 3. They all like the song that was suggested -> There is nothing about that in the PM aswell actually, now that I read it. Nobody said anything about that song except for Jan and he said "he would prefer it" not that you have to send it. 4. Wo wo wo, wait. Between you sent another song which was a massive hit in Italy which wouldn't be realistic at all for San Marino. And that the singer has a VEVO account makes it even more unrealistic for San Marino. 5. Yeah both singers had massive hits. But wait, for example me: Well if her last hit was long ago, I'd say yes Says it all. 6. NO REASON? LOOOOOL here No, to the second song too from me Reasons:- It's on a VEVO and it's a "disadvantage". - It seems like it was a hit in Italy (it got #1). So finally: Just select an unknown singer. Because "your" view of realistic isn't very good at all. We won't change the rule that we need to accept songs first because of users like you. If you don't like the rules, withdraw.
|
|
Jess
Retired Administrator
she/they
|
Post by Jess on Aug 8, 2014 13:24:27 GMT 1
I can't even
|
|
Dylan
Moderator
he/him
12,499
29,537
Free Palestine💚💗🤍🖤 and join yoshi's new DIVA
|
Post by Dylan on Aug 8, 2014 13:28:44 GMT 1
Personally I don't love the rule but as long as my entry is accepted I don't mind lol
|
|
|
Post by Jasmin on Aug 8, 2014 13:30:17 GMT 1
Why would I send an unknown singer and song to finish last in SF or something. That's your wiew of realistic, and that's what I'm talking about. Just because some countries don't qualify very often in Eurovision, NBU wants to make the same here. Looking through the discussion, I actually don't see anything which says the NBU rejected the first entry. Than Alexia-Dimmi Come for San Marino. Bye :*
|
|
|
Post by Anesović on Aug 8, 2014 13:30:18 GMT 1
I won't have anything against that rule, cuz I sure won't really send anything unrealisticly anways (Well, not like before, with Nathalie & Axel Tony )
|
|
|
Post by Asi on Aug 8, 2014 13:31:58 GMT 1
I quite like it Because we won't see Hadise for Luxembourg
|
|
|
Post by Asi on Aug 8, 2014 13:32:41 GMT 1
Why would I send an unknown singer and song to finish last in SF or something. That's your wiew of realistic, and that's what I'm talking about. Just because some countries don't qualify very often in Eurovision, NBU wants to make the same here. Looking through the discussion, I actually don't see anything which says the NBU rejected the first entry. Than Alexia-Dimmi Come for San Marino. Bye :* Alida is unknown and won.
|
|
Daniel
Retired Administrator
He/any
18,846
55,119
Dell powers
|
Post by Daniel on Aug 8, 2014 13:33:44 GMT 1
Why would I send an unknown singer and song to finish last in SF or something. That's your wiew of realistic, and that's what I'm talking about. Just because some countries don't qualify very often in Eurovision, NBU wants to make the same here. LOL WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? I am just saying Bosnia won with a singer no one ever even heard before and IT ALWAYS FAILED BEFORE THAT. Why do you think we don't want some countries to qualify? Look at Germany, which has almost always failed but is ALWAYS in the Eurovision Final and got through with Sydney Eggeston I think you're just trying to get revenge because James gave you strikes longer ago. I can just say that too.
|
|
|
Post by Anesović on Aug 8, 2014 13:35:05 GMT 1
Unknown Singer ≠ Bad Position in semi
|
|