6,115
9,597
´i want it, i got it´
|
Post by Kerem on May 18, 2016 19:13:03 GMT 1
So actually Jamala performed "1944" under an another song title and language in 2015
|
|
|
Post by fabbi on May 18, 2016 20:37:44 GMT 1
I already had some hope for her to be disqualified ---> Dami wins instead. Then I read the shoutbox and had a look at Google.
|
|
|
Post by αndreas on May 18, 2016 20:38:27 GMT 1
I already had some hope for her to be disqualified sorry but are you serious
|
|
|
Post by fabbi on May 18, 2016 20:48:31 GMT 1
I already had some hope for her to be disqualified sorry but are you serious At first I was indeed. I know I'm a weird person sometimes.
|
|
|
Post by Julian on May 18, 2016 21:14:13 GMT 1
sorry but are you serious At first I was indeed. I know I'm a weird person sometimes. Hoping for someone to get disqualified, just to get what you want, is not weird, it's disrespectful
|
|
3,628
10,070
The end is near
|
Post by Matilda on May 18, 2016 22:05:18 GMT 1
I don't see the EBU disqualifying a winner tbh. It would cause too much bad publicity which they don't want.
|
|
|
Post by Huberdini on May 18, 2016 22:43:12 GMT 1
They're not gonna disqualify her: the rule is that the song can't be commercially released before September. However this wasn't released onto iTunes or Spotify or anything - it was just performed. It's the same as Anja Nissen's "Never Alone", it was performed before the timeframe but still would've been accepted.
|
|
|
Post by MG on May 18, 2016 23:20:29 GMT 1
This describes perfectly fans reactions at 2016 results Sorry if this offends someone.
|
|
|
Post by fabbi on May 19, 2016 8:13:26 GMT 1
At first I was indeed. I know I'm a weird person sometimes. Hoping for someone to get disqualified, just to get what you want, is not weird, it's disrespectful Omg no.
|
|
|
Post by Jan on May 19, 2016 13:26:32 GMT 1
"In the past, songs that had been publicly available before the deadline, but had not been accessible by a wide audience, had been granted permission to compete in the Eurovision Song Contest by the Reference Group.
In the case of Jamala’s “1944” the EBU’s attention has been drawn, after the 2016 Eurovision Song Contest, to a public performance of an earlier version of the song in May 2015.The video of a small concert had only been viewed by a few hundred people before it was discovered in the past few days.
The EBU, based on previous decisions in the Reference Group, therefore has concluded that the published video did not give Jamala’s song any unfair advantage in the 2016 Eurovision Song Contest and the song was eligible to compete."
told ya
|
|