|
Post by George on Jul 31, 2016 15:12:48 GMT 1
A New Era in SVSC61 countries will participate in Super Vision Song Contest #20 making a historic moment and a record for the contest. Withdrawing countries -> Estonia, Serbia, Taiwan Returning countries -> Andorra, China, Colombia, Cyprus, Iceland, Kosovo, Monaco, Morocco Debuting countries -> Ecuador, Indonesia, Malaysia, Peru, Singapore β’ New Temporary SystemAt the beginning,there will be 4 Semi Finals which each of them will have 14 countries. 4 Countries will pass to the Grand Final.The places 5,6 & 7 will move on to the Second Chance Round where 6 countries will pass out of 12. 27 Countries will be in the final,as the top 5 of SVSC#19, Denmark, Italy, Ireland, Norway and Belarus,will be automatically qualifiers.
Tell us our thoughts about the new system as we tried to bring something fresh and fair one. SVSC COUNCIL( George / ππππππ ) Thanks to Maxim too.
|
|
8,925
7,298
β«β« Busy, busy, busy doing more than Ace Wilder β«β«
|
Post by ESCIliasMANL (Inactive) on Jul 31, 2016 15:27:47 GMT 1
Sounds really cool imo I am already very excited
|
|
|
Post by Maxim on Jul 31, 2016 15:40:19 GMT 1
tbh it sounds good but I would suggest you do it a little bit different.. 1) The point of a QF is that it will be easier to vote over there and in the semis.. so I don't understand the point of making 2 QF's with 30 participants and 20 qualifiers, when it's better (imho) to do 4 QF's with 15 and 10 Qualifiers from each to the SF's 2) imo SC is not really necessary in contests, but if you do it, isn't it more logical that it will be with the entries failing in the SF's and not the QF's? if they qualified from the QF to the SF's aren't they "better" than those who failed in the QF, and deserve more to have a chance to qualify to the final? 3) (almost) All contests have AQ's, and as more countries participate in the contest, isn't it more logical that there will be more AQ's? I think that 1 AQ out of 61 participants is way too less (and I'm not saying it bcz I finished 4th). I will keep participating in this contest either you make these changes or not because I love it, but plz take it into consideration, it will be better that way imo
|
|
|
Post by George on Jul 31, 2016 15:48:49 GMT 1
tbh it sounds good but I would suggest you do it a little bit different.. 1) The point of a QF is that it will be easier to vote over there and in the semis.. so I don't understand the point of making 2 QF's with 30 participants and 20 qualifiers, when it's better (imho) to do 4 QF's with 15 and 10 Qualifiers from each to the SF's 2) imo SC is not really necessary in contests, but if you do it, isn't it more logical that it will be with the entries failing in the SF's and not the QF's? if they qualified from the QF to the SF's aren't they "better" than those who failed in the QF, and deserve more to have a chance to qualify to the final? 3) (almost) All contests have AQ's, and as more countries participate in the contest, isn't it more logical that there will be more AQ's? I think that 1 AQ out of 61 participants is way too less (and I'm not saying it bcz I finished 4th). I will keep participating in this contest either you make these changes or not because I love it, but plz take it into consideration, it will be better that way imo 1) Tbh,I like your idea and yeah it would be more easier to vote as having 30 songs it is not easy.So your point here is to have 4 QFs with 15 participants,10 qualifiers from each one and 2 semis with 20 countries from which 10 countries will pass,right? 2) well,I would like to give a chance to the songs which will lose quite early as if a quarter final is very hard then some good songs might be lost.I believe that if a country reach semi finals is stronger than a non-qf entry. 3)You have a point here and if we take into consideration your system: 61-5: 56 countries : 4 = 14 in each quarter final. Don't mind I believe that your suggestions are correct and even more fair than ours,so the system will be changed to this(i have to edit my post now lel)
|
|
|
Post by Maxim on Jul 31, 2016 16:03:13 GMT 1
tbh it sounds good but I would suggest you do it a little bit different.. 1) The point of a QF is that it will be easier to vote over there and in the semis.. so I don't understand the point of making 2 QF's with 30 participants and 20 qualifiers, when it's better (imho) to do 4 QF's with 15 and 10 Qualifiers from each to the SF's 2) imo SC is not really necessary in contests, but if you do it, isn't it more logical that it will be with the entries failing in the SF's and not the QF's? if they qualified from the QF to the SF's aren't they "better" than those who failed in the QF, and deserve more to have a chance to qualify to the final? 3) (almost) All contests have AQ's, and as more countries participate in the contest, isn't it more logical that there will be more AQ's? I think that 1 AQ out of 61 participants is way too less (and I'm not saying it bcz I finished 4th). I will keep participating in this contest either you make these changes or not because I love it, but plz take it into consideration, it will be better that way imo 1) Tbh,I like your idea and yeah it would be more easier to vote as having 30 songs it is not easy.So your point here is to have 4 QFs with 15 participants,10 qualifiers from each one and 2 semis with 20 countries from which 10 countries will pass,right? 2) well,I would like to give a chance to the songs which will lose quite early as if a quarter final is very hard then some good songs might be lost.I believe that if a country reach semi finals is stronger than a non-qf entry. 3)You have a point here and if we take into consideration your system: 61-5: 56 countries : 4 = 14 in each quarter final. Don't mind I believe that your suggestions are correct and even more fair than ours,so the system will be changed to this(i have to edit my post now lel) Oh Great 1) Yes, or you can make 4 Semi's with 14/15 entries which the top 5 from each qualifies straight to the final and joins the AQ's, without SC and QF's, and if you really want a SC, it can be 4 straight qualifiers and 3 will go to a SC from which 5 qualify to the final, and join the 16 straight qualifiers and the 5 AQ's, which is 26 finalists. I think one of those ways will be the best bcz it will be easier fro the participants to vote, more tense, and less recaps and result videos for you. 2) imo it's not really fair as the finalists are suppose to be the best 25/26 entries from the edition, and those failing in the QF are the "worst" in the edition as they were eliminated in the QF for a reason, and giving them another opportunity instead of this which were close to qualify to the final isn't really fair imo.. but it's your choice 3) yes you can do it that way too
|
|
|
Post by George on Jul 31, 2016 16:10:05 GMT 1
1) Tbh,I like your idea and yeah it would be more easier to vote as having 30 songs it is not easy.So your point here is to have 4 QFs with 15 participants,10 qualifiers from each one and 2 semis with 20 countries from which 10 countries will pass,right? 2) well,I would like to give a chance to the songs which will lose quite early as if a quarter final is very hard then some good songs might be lost.I believe that if a country reach semi finals is stronger than a non-qf entry. 3)You have a point here and if we take into consideration your system: 61-5: 56 countries : 4 = 14 in each quarter final. Don't mind I believe that your suggestions are correct and even more fair than ours,so the system will be changed to this(i have to edit my post now lel) Oh Great 1) Yes, or you can make 4 Semi's with 14/15 entries which the top 5 from each qualifies straight to the final and joins the AQ's, without SC and QF's, and if you really want a SC, it can be 4 straight qualifiers and 3 will go to a SC from which 5 qualify to the final, and join the 16 straight qualifiers and the 5 AQ's, which is 26 finalists. I think one of those ways will be the best bcz it will be easier fro the participants to vote, more tense, and less recaps and result videos for you. 2) imo it's not really fair as the finalists are suppose to be the best 25/26 entries from the edition, and those failing in the QF are the "worst" in the edition as they were eliminated in the QF for a reason, and giving them another opportunity instead of this which were close to qualify to the final isn't really fair imo.. but it's your choice 3) yes you can do it that way too K decided I will vote for your second option in the first choice Imo,your ideas are great.
|
|
|
Post by Maxim on Jul 31, 2016 16:34:42 GMT 1
Oh Great 1) Yes, or you can make 4 Semi's with 14/15 entries which the top 5 from each qualifies straight to the final and joins the AQ's, without SC and QF's, and if you really want a SC, it can be 4 straight qualifiers and 3 will go to a SC from which 5 qualify to the final, and join the 16 straight qualifiers and the 5 AQ's, which is 26 finalists. I think one of those ways will be the best bcz it will be easier fro the participants to vote, more tense, and less recaps and result videos for you. 2) imo it's not really fair as the finalists are suppose to be the best 25/26 entries from the edition, and those failing in the QF are the "worst" in the edition as they were eliminated in the QF for a reason, and giving them another opportunity instead of this which were close to qualify to the final isn't really fair imo.. but it's your choice 3) yes you can do it that way too K decided I will vote for your second option in the first choice Imo,your ideas are great. lol you're welcome Glad to help
|
|
|
Post by George J. on Jul 31, 2016 16:35:38 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by George on Jul 31, 2016 16:38:52 GMT 1
Peru, Switzerland, United Kingdom...Stop making the edition stronger and stronger
|
|
2,045
4,394
Bitches better beware
|
Post by Queen of Mean (Inactive) on Jul 31, 2016 16:55:39 GMT 1
Don't forget to vote in the Hungarian NS "A Dal #20". The voting ends on Wednesday, 3rd of August 2:00 PM CEST!
|
|