|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2017 22:39:26 GMT 1
Up to from
|
|
|
Post by Nutzername92a on Mar 12, 2017 23:46:32 GMT 1
Between all the points, I'm just adding my I enjoy the song a lot, it's different and entertaining, but I don't understand all the hype The dance moves don't make me freak out either. Don't get me wrong, it's a really good entry, definitely in top 10 this year, but I don't see it winning.
|
|
1,916
4,476
I like cheese
|
Post by Gregory (inactive) on Mar 13, 2017 10:45:45 GMT 1
- I'm with the hype
|
|
Dylan
Moderator
he/him
12,494
29,534
Free Palestine💚💗🤍🖤 and join yoshi's new DIVA
|
Post by Dylan on Mar 13, 2017 15:43:12 GMT 1
for now
|
|
|
Post by George on Mar 17, 2017 17:04:45 GMT 1
Um why Italy ;_; The esc version doesn't sound so cool at all especiall when it comes the second refrain. I don't know if this version will have a impact in his result but we will see. Down to .
|
|
|
Post by linux620 on Mar 17, 2017 17:28:28 GMT 1
Thank god they didn't add english lyrics to the song! But, it was a stupid decision to remove the 2nd verse. The song feels now like a poor drag&drop edit version. They could for example add in the ESC performance 3-5 second pause between the 1st and 2nd chorus, so the transistion wouldn't sound so bad. But it's still a from me
|
|
|
Post by MaRtIn on Mar 17, 2017 20:52:26 GMT 1
Ugh. Stupid 3-minute rule. It's Italy's fault to begin with. They sent a 5-minute song in 1957, and it bored the jury. And that's how the limit was set. I hope the live performance is smoother. It still sounds great. If Il Volo can get rid of their second verse and still win the televote, I have no doubt about this entry doing well also.
Cutting the second verse was probably the best choice here. It mentioned the brand "Chanel," which would probably cause drama with the EBU just like with 2012.
|
|
5,154
14,298
Host of Festival of Miracles
|
Post by Gilberto on Mar 17, 2017 21:31:13 GMT 1
I don't hear any ''weird transition'' Giving that they had to cut something out, I think they took the right decision to remove the second verse
|
|
|
Post by Fatih on Mar 17, 2017 23:55:32 GMT 1
Still 12 Still Winner
|
|
|
Post by OMAROSA on Mar 18, 2017 2:38:50 GMT 1
It sounds so awkward how it was cut down to three minutes lol They could've cut out the part with the dancing ape after the second chorus and gone straight to the middle eight where the song dies down a bit so the final chorus at the end is more powerful. That way they could at least retain some semblance of a verse between the first and second choruses. And it wouldn't be that hard to change the name Chanel to something else.
It's still good, but now it feels like the middle of the song is just one gigantic chorus because now it doesn't have the regular up-and-down intervals anymore; it just goes up and stays that way for most of the song.
|
|