6,115
9,597
ยดi want it, i got itยด
|
Post by Kerem on Jul 10, 2013 5:33:00 GMT 1
Hey, you gave me your suggestions what should change in ESC 2014. So here they are. You can vote for 3 suggestions. Thank you  ESCTurkeyFan67 |
|
10,451
17,137
๐๐บ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ข๐ต๐ฉ๐บ
|
Post by ๐ด๐๐๐๐ฬ on Jul 10, 2013 10:12:59 GMT 1
WTF  Anke Engelke as a host NO, the contest is host in  Denmark not in  Germany |
|
|
|
Post by George on Jul 10, 2013 10:15:48 GMT 1
Anke Engelke as host and Australia and South Korea as participants shouldn't be in this poll.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2013 10:25:12 GMT 1
I highly doubt Australia will be making an appearance, at all. They send commentators, but that's about all the involvement they have.
Korea? As in this I believe you are referring to the South, yet again it's never happening.
Doubt Turkey will be returning, anytime soon.
Anke would suit hosting, in her home territory. It's Denmark's spotlight, the host(s) should be Danish.
Eurovision in Concert is great, but I do think it would be nice to have it elsewhere than The Netherlands.
Qualifiers need to be spaced out better, and the voting slowing down slightly.
The draw should be random, I do agree.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2013 10:40:48 GMT 1
There was a hurry in the voting, and also why the reprise was cut off, is time limit. The EBU itself only has a timeslot for ESC, which was 3 and a half hours, and it was a close call, so things already had to speed up, and so Petra was issued by the producers, also in rehearsals, to just ask for their votes immediately.  But quite frankly, I don't like any of the options. ESC 2011/2012: The best examples of a rich-financed ESC in years. (That means hosts etcetera.) LED Walls in the new Azerbaijani arena. ESC 2013: The best example of a traditional, yet modernly filled television show, and marginally budgetted. I want to see even more ESC 2013, and less ESC 2011/2012. It should indeed as ESC 2013 carried out, be with a tiny bit show, but focused on the songs, not like they did in 2011/2012, when I already because of the damn shows they gave, forgot half of the songs. So Denmark, do it better than Sweden, but a lot better than Germany and Azerbaijan.  |
|
6,115
9,597
ยดi want it, i got itยด
|
Post by Kerem on Jul 10, 2013 12:31:12 GMT 1
SORRY IF ANYONE DON'T LIKE ANY SUGGESTIONS. BUT THE SUGGESTIONS COME FROM USERS NOT FROM ME |
|
Tom
Banned Forever
9,950
8,797
โซ โฅ Tom117323 | < 3 Eurovision Song Contest < 3 Online Song Contests < 3 โฅ โซ
|
Post by Tom on Jul 10, 2013 12:38:22 GMT 1
SORRY IF ANYONE DON'T LIKE ANY SUGGESTIONS. BUT THE SUGGESTIONS COME FROM USERS NOT FROM ME I actually said that they can better not make a video of  Australia when they aren't participating, or otherwise they should be in the ESC like the other countries.  But well, Australia as a participant is also a nice idea...  |
|
Rick
Retired Administrator
12,513
25,981
Did it frighten you, how we kissed when we danced on the light up floor?
|
Post by Rick on Jul 10, 2013 13:00:33 GMT 1
There was a hurry in the voting, and also why the reprise was cut off, is time limit. The EBU itself only has a timeslot for ESC, which was 3 and a half hours, and it was a close call, so things already had to speed up, and so Petra was issued by the producers, also in rehearsals, to just ask for their votes immediately. But quite frankly, I don't like any of the options. ESC 2011/2012: The best examples of a rich-financed ESC in years. (That means hosts etcetera.) LED Walls in the new Azerbaijani arena. ESC 2013: The best example of a traditional, yet modernly filled television show, and marginally budgetted. I want to see even more ESC 2013, and less ESC 2011/2012. It should indeed as ESC 2013 carried out, be with a tiny bit show, but focused on the songs, not like they did in 2011/2012, when I already because of the damn shows they gave, forgot half of the songs. So Denmark, do it better than Sweden, but a lot better than Germany and Azerbaijan. Actually; ESC 2010 was the best ESC ever! |
|
6,115
9,597
ยดi want it, i got itยด
|
Post by Kerem on Jul 10, 2013 13:03:20 GMT 1
There was a hurry in the voting, and also why the reprise was cut off, is time limit. The EBU itself only has a timeslot for ESC, which was 3 and a half hours, and it was a close call, so things already had to speed up, and so Petra was issued by the producers, also in rehearsals, to just ask for their votes immediately. But quite frankly, I don't like any of the options. ESC 2011/2012: The best examples of a rich-financed ESC in years. (That means hosts etcetera.) LED Walls in the new Azerbaijani arena. ESC 2013: The best example of a traditional, yet modernly filled television show, and marginally budgetted. I want to see even more ESC 2013, and less ESC 2011/2012. It should indeed as ESC 2013 carried out, be with a tiny bit show, but focused on the songs, not like they did in 2011/2012, when I already because of the damn shows they gave, forgot half of the songs. So Denmark, do it better than Sweden, but a lot better than Germany and Azerbaijan. Actually; ESC 2010 was the best ESC ever! 2009? |
|
Rick
Retired Administrator
12,513
25,981
Did it frighten you, how we kissed when we danced on the light up floor?
|
Post by Rick on Jul 10, 2013 13:05:15 GMT 1
Actually; ESC 2010 was the best ESC ever! 2009? Nah 2010 was the best |
|
Anke Engelke as a host NO, the contest is host in 
But well, 
