1,942
5,805
Our first caress
|
Post by Mordecai on Feb 18, 2016 10:22:04 GMT 1
MASSIVE CHANGE IN PRESENTATION OF EUROVISION VOTES
(Taken from eurovision.tv) The voting in the Eurovision Song Contest is set to be radically transformed in 2016. In previous years the results of the professional juries and viewers have been presented as a combined result, each accounting for 50 percent of the final score. From 2016, the professional juries and televoters from each country will each award a separate set of points from 1 to 8, 10 and 12. This now means the top 10 countries in both the jury and televote will receive points, adding a new level of excitement for hundreds of millions of viewers in Europe and beyond.
How does it work?
After viewers have cast their votes by telephone, SMS or using the official app, each national spokesperson from the 43 participating countries will be called in to present the points of their professional jury. After the presentation of the scores from the juries, the televoting points from all participating countries will be combined, providing one score for each song. These televoting results will then be announced by the host, starting with the country receiving the fewest points from the public and ending with the country that received the highest number of points, building towards a guaranteed climax.
For those wanting to know how their country has voted, the televoting and jury scores from each participating country will be available after the show on Eurovision.tv.
What does this mean? - The amount of points countries will receive will increase dramatically - Alexander Rybak's record of 387 points will undoubtedly be broken this year. - Countries will no longer distribute a total of 58 points - it will be double to 116. - Suspense for the results will drastically increase, as the winner will only be known after the final set of televotes have been given. - Juries and televotes will no longer cancel each other out - they will be counted as separate sets of votes.
|
|
|
Post by ✨💃 on Feb 18, 2016 10:23:25 GMT 1
tbh I don't know what to think about it it's like in Melodifestivalen and in some contests here (with qualifiers and non-qualifiers votes) tho I think that's like more promotion of juries but the televoting part will be very interesting then and ESC will last more time, so I think it's ok I'm not the biggest fan of it and I don't have anything against it maybe change in voting is needed
|
|
|
Post by George on Feb 18, 2016 10:25:51 GMT 1
I like it
|
|
|
Post by ~Rethnas~ on Feb 18, 2016 17:26:24 GMT 1
I like the way they will do it from now on it will make everything more exciting
|
|
|
Post by (inactive) on Feb 18, 2016 21:17:36 GMT 1
Even though I would prefer televoting results to be announced by the spokespersons and juries combined, it would look like juries decide the winner while now the televotes will actually decide the winning country
|
|
|
Post by MaRtIn on Feb 18, 2016 21:18:35 GMT 1
And Italy still wouldn't have won 2015.
|
|
|
Post by Huberdini on Feb 18, 2016 23:16:12 GMT 1
And Italy still wouldn't have won 2015. I'm glad
|
|
8,543
11,907
You're stuck on me like a Tattoo 💙💛💙
|
Post by Josh's Tattoo (Inactive) on Feb 18, 2016 23:32:34 GMT 1
Soo happy with the changes
|
|
|
Post by Nutzername92a on Feb 19, 2016 2:58:15 GMT 1
I hate it. The voting procedure was one of the best things about Eurovision. I always loved to have all the different countries sing their different songs and tell us their different votes in the end. But now they (SVT) killed it. Now the televoting will be presented as if Europe was just one country. This works in Melodifestivalen because Sweden IS one country. But in Eurovision it takes away ALL of the televoting's charm. I loved watching the voting and be like: "Oh 8 points from Albania, thanks Albania! And 3 points from Georgia, cool! And omg, 12 points from Latvia, they seemed to really love it ". THOSE were the little things that created the excitement for me. "Knowing the winner in the last minute" is not the most important kind of excitement imo. But now we will just get the unpersonal points delivered by the host, not knowing where they came from. This is so boring. Why should I look up the countries' votes on the internet after the show if you can just present them during the show as it was always done?? We will only see the jury votes -.- I don't care what those 5 "music experts" from each country voted for. I want to know what the country voted for. And personally, I don't even think that it was a problem that Loreen already was the obvious winner after 30 or something countries. We all knew months before the show that she would win. So please. Some people say that Sweden should never be the host again, lol. I of course wouldn't be this drastic, but I certainly don't like all those unnecessary changes made by Sweden... If the spokespersons of each country are only allowed to announce their 12p of the jury vote, I honestly wonder why there are spokespersons AT ALL. It's simply not worth the effort. I wouldn't be surprised if spokespersons will be completely removed by 2017. And that's sad. This is such a depressing move in the wrong direction. I'm very open for change, but not if it's so poorly done and has almost no benefits.
|
|
|
Post by (inactive) on Feb 19, 2016 6:25:11 GMT 1
Even though it wasn't said loudly in the presentation of the new system video, it was kinda showed in animation that when announcing televoting results we'll get to see which countries which amounts of points have given. If that's really about to happen, I think it solves some of the problems
|
|