|
|
Post by Phil on May 15, 2016 19:37:26 GMT 1
6th ! #yay
|
|
|
|
Post by MaRtIn on May 15, 2016 21:28:58 GMT 1
7th! Nice!  |
|
3,735
7,633
know my love's infinite, nothing i wouldn't do
|
Post by manos on May 15, 2016 22:06:47 GMT 1
congratulations to me for being the biggest flop, lmaooooo I saw this thread at the final only, mess  |
|
|
|
Post by Vaios on May 15, 2016 23:51:35 GMT 1
5th, not bad  |
|
|
|
Post by Julian on May 17, 2016 21:13:57 GMT 1
Random.org may get me more points lol
Well, lets see. Official prediction of ramdom.org Lets see, who is worse than random.org Austria Armenia Israel Serbia Cyprus Sweden Russia Poland Czech Republic Belgium Croatia Australia Lithuania Azerbaijan Latvia Ukraine Hungary Spain Georgia France Germany Italy Malta United Kingdom Bulgaria Netherlands Actually, everyone except linux620 and 𝖋𝖑𝖔𝖗𝖎𝖆𝖓 was worse than random.org. It "predicted"     correctly |
|
|
|
Post by Niklas on Apr 2, 2017 17:47:16 GMT 1
I'd love to have this back tbh
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenajabam on Apr 2, 2017 18:44:46 GMT 1
I'd love to have this back tbh But with a better point system for the final pls.  |
|
|
|
Post by Julian on Apr 3, 2017 18:00:44 GMT 1
I'd love to have this back tbh But with a better point system for the final pls. Suggest a better system then  |
|
|
|
Post by Kenajabam on Apr 6, 2017 9:54:33 GMT 1
But with a better point system for the final pls. Suggest a better system then Hm, the problem is that my random.org prediction would have scored pretty well, because it predicted some countries on the exact same spot, but was otherwise completely off. So we just cant only give points, if the country is on the exact same place. You agree with that problem? So, for example  San Marino is in 7th place, I put it on place 4, you on place 17. We would have to get points on the distance of our predictions. So e.g. we have 10 points, if we put it in the right place. Per place away -1, so I get 7, you get nothing. Obviously the points for the qualifiers would then have to be higher, too. I guess that would be a lot of counting work though. Maybe you have a better idea. |
|
|
|
Post by Julian on Apr 6, 2017 10:20:51 GMT 1
Suggest a better system then Hm, the problem is that my random.org prediction would have scored pretty well, because it predicted some countries on the exact same spot, but was otherwise completely off. So we just cant only give points, if the country is on the exact same place. You agree with that problem? So, for example  San Marino is in 7th place, I put it on place 4, you on place 17. We would have to get points on the distance of our predictions. So e.g. we have 10 points, if we put it in the right place. Per place away -1, so I get 7, you get nothing. Obviously the points for the qualifiers would then have to be higher, too. I guess that would be a lot of counting work though. Maybe you have a better idea. I think giving points for a specific span of places would be okay, so if San Marino placed 7th, then everyone who predicted it between 5th and 9th place could get points, with the correct prediction getting extra points. I will probably use this system for both the semi final and final With your system even someone who predicted it to win or someone who predicted it on 16th place would get points, which is a too huge span as you'd get points for nearly every country then |
|
| OAmSC 
| OAfSC 
| BMF 
| SSC