Daniel
Retired Administrator
He/any
18,846
55,119
Dell powers
|
Post by Daniel on Mar 15, 2015 11:49:54 GMT 1
I don't get how people that complained about the low number of PQR qualifiers before
are now saying that "one more PQR qualifier doesn't matter" haha
|
|
Daniel
Retired Administrator
He/any
18,846
55,119
Dell powers
|
Post by Daniel on Mar 15, 2015 12:00:10 GMT 1
So it means that this rule would only regulate the number of semi-finalists, which is, imo, not a priority because we can find another way to do it, like, for example, cancelling the PQR when there's already 20 countries in each semi. If there is a low number of PQR qualifiers like this edition even if there are 21 Semi-finalists each we would at least have 2 qualifiers  |
|
Eke
Technical Staff
they/them/any
6,640
30,747
but it's me who makes myself mad
|
Post by Eke on Mar 15, 2015 12:04:40 GMT 1
 has voted. I have a suggestion too. EBU invited Australia to participate in eurovision. Can't NBU do the same with the non European countries? My suggestion was: Each 10 editions there is a special edition, on which non-partipating countries battle in a PQR or smth like that lol.  I agree  And then if a country is selected one special edition, this country can't be selected again the next special edition, just to make it more fair  |
|
|
|
Post by Franck on Mar 15, 2015 12:06:17 GMT 1
So it means that this rule would only regulate the number of semi-finalists, which is, imo, not a priority because we can find another way to do it, like, for example, cancelling the PQR when there's already 20 countries in each semi. If there is a low number of PQR qualifiers like this edition even if there are 21 Semi-finalists each we would at least have 2 qualifiers I think the problem of the low number of qualifiers from PQR this edition comes from the rule that forbids a country to end in the PQR twice in-a-row. If all the countries that were in PQR last edition but still finished in the bottom five of their semi-finals were in the PQR (which I find normal, and more fair to the other countries), we would have less problems regulating the numbers of semi-finals AND PQR qualifiers. You know what I mean? |
|
Eke
Technical Staff
they/them/any
6,640
30,747
but it's me who makes myself mad
|
Post by Eke on Mar 15, 2015 12:07:18 GMT 1
If there is a low number of PQR qualifiers like this edition even if there are 21 Semi-finalists each we would at least have 2 qualifiers I think the problem of the low number of qualifiers from PQR this edition comes from the rule that forbids a country to end in the PQR twice in-a-row. If all the countries that were in PQR last edition but still finished in the bottom five of their semi-finals were in the PQR (which I find normal, and more fair to the other countries), we would have less problems regulating the numbers of semi-finals AND PQR qualifiers. You know what I mean? But that would mean some countries would end up in the PQR almost every time  |
|
|
|
Post by Phil on Mar 15, 2015 12:08:50 GMT 1
If there is a low number of PQR qualifiers like this edition even if there are 21 Semi-finalists each we would at least have 2 qualifiers I think the problem of the low number of qualifiers from PQR this edition comes from the rule that forbids a country to end in the PQR twice in-a-row. If all the countries that were in PQR last edition but still finished in the bottom five of their semi-finals were in the PQR (which I find normal, and more fair to the other countries), we would have less problems regulating the numbers of semi-finals AND PQR qualifiers. You know what I mean? Take countries such as  Armenia,  Luxembourg, who often end low and get into the PQR. It's not very funny to enter it (I almost did too). So I find it normal to avoid having the PQR twice in a row. |
|
Daniel
Retired Administrator
He/any
18,846
55,119
Dell powers
|
Post by Daniel on Mar 15, 2015 12:11:04 GMT 1
If there is a low number of PQR qualifiers like this edition even if there are 21 Semi-finalists each we would at least have 2 qualifiers I think the problem of the low number of qualifiers from PQR this edition comes from the rule that forbids a country to end in the PQR twice in-a-row. If all the countries that were in PQR last edition but still finished in the bottom five of their semi-finals were in the PQR (which I find normal, and more fair to the other countries), we would have less problems regulating the numbers of semi-finals AND PQR qualifiers. You know what I mean? Yes I think the same but it isn't that nice that people can get stuck in the PQR then ;_; |
|
|
|
Post by Kenajabam on Mar 15, 2015 13:07:30 GMT 1
I don't get how people that complained about the low number of PQR qualifiers before are now saying that "one more PQR qualifier doesn't matter" haha I guess, you didnt get what I meant. But I cant explain it better, so whatever. ^^ |
|
Daniel
Retired Administrator
He/any
18,846
55,119
Dell powers
|
Post by Daniel on Mar 15, 2015 13:09:27 GMT 1
I don't get how people that complained about the low number of PQR qualifiers before are now saying that "one more PQR qualifier doesn't matter" haha I guess, you didnt get what I meant. But I cant explain it better, so whatever. ^^ Wasn't referring to you anyway |
|
Aless
Retired Administrator
he/him
10,269
27,578
funk generation
|
Post by Aless on Mar 15, 2015 13:14:57 GMT 1
I think the problem of the low number of qualifiers from PQR this edition comes from the rule that forbids a country to end in the PQR twice in-a-row. If all the countries that were in PQR last edition but still finished in the bottom five of their semi-finals were in the PQR (which I find normal, and more fair to the other countries), we would have less problems regulating the numbers of semi-finals AND PQR qualifiers. You know what I mean? Yes I think the same but it isn't that nice that people can get stuck in the PQR then ;_;  |
|
| OAmSC 
| OAfSC 
| BMF 
| SSC 
