|
|
Post by kev on Mar 10, 2015 16:19:37 GMT 1
A Big 6 instead of a Big 5 = 26 Finalists 1 less user who have to join the PQR  |
|
Daniel
Retired Administrator
He/any
18,846
55,119
Dell powers
|
Post by Daniel on Mar 10, 2015 17:37:39 GMT 1
A Big 6 instead of a Big 5 = 26 Finalists 1 less user who have to join the PQR I think this would be acceptable Jan |
|
Jan
NBU Council
he/him
24,449
73,241
π³π΄πΊ
|
Post by Jan on Mar 10, 2015 17:41:06 GMT 1
I would be ok with it I'd prefered though if someone came up with this idea a bit earlier as I came 6th in NVSC 12   |
|
|
|
Post by Vaios on Mar 10, 2015 17:42:12 GMT 1
I don't think one more automatic finalist will do such a difference  If you asked me, I would say to stay with Big 5 as it was always like this. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2015 17:45:57 GMT 1
The 6th can be the country with the highest amount of qualifies at the moment. This way, it can be switched very often (eg. if Sweden has qualified (lets say) 11 times and it is in the Big 6 for one edition, it has qualified 11 times after the edition and other countries may have qualified 12 times in that time, so a 12-qualified-country can take its place now).
This way, countries who often qualify are in the Final and give others more chances.
|
|
|
|
Post by kev on Mar 10, 2015 17:53:31 GMT 1
I don't think one more automatic finalist will do such a difference If you asked me, I would say to stay with Big 5 as it was always like this. I think one country less in the PQR is better for some Countries And 26 Countries in the Final is more realistic But itΒ΄s your opinion  |
|
|
|
Post by Vaios on Mar 10, 2015 17:55:30 GMT 1
I don't think one more automatic finalist will do such a difference If you asked me, I would say to stay with Big 5 as it was always like this. I think one country less in the PQR is better for some Countries And 26 Countries in the Final is more realistic But itΒ΄s you opinion The number of the countries in P.Q.R. will still be 10 (bottom 5) even with 30 finalists |
|
|
|
Post by kev on Mar 10, 2015 17:57:41 GMT 1
I think one country less in the PQR is better for some Countries And 26 Countries in the Final is more realistic But itΒ΄s you opinion The number of the countries in P.Q.R. will still be 10 (bottom 5) even with 30 finalists Oh Hopefully Norway will end 6th this edition |
|
Jan
NBU Council
he/him
24,449
73,241
π³π΄πΊ
|
Post by Jan on Mar 10, 2015 17:59:40 GMT 1
I think one country less in the PQR is better for some Countries And 26 Countries in the Final is more realistic But itΒ΄s you opinion The number of the countries in P.Q.R. will still be 10 (bottom 5) even with 30 finalists But there would be one more qualifier, as a "semi-finalist" becomes a "direct finalist" and therefore a spot in the semi-final becomes free |
|
|
|
Post by kev on Mar 22, 2015 9:05:28 GMT 1
The draw of the Grand Final (for all Countries ) should be after both Semi Finals , because the Big5 (6) have a better chance for a good place than countries from Semi Final 2 :\ For example : In this edition there are only places in the first half (and some in the second ) for the second Semi Finalists But it's just my opinion  |
|
